TRIBUNNEWS.COM, JAKARTA – The vice president of the kpk, La Ode Muhammad Syarif, has revealed that the former management of KPK Gentlement had reached an agreement or agreement with the government as part of the revision of the KPK law. Of course, this type of effort garnered protests from different quarters and eventually led to an almost chaotic situation at the end of New Order`s reign. Pancasila`s ideological efforts in the private sector, in one way or another, will only divide the nation, not strengthen unity. In fact, Pancasila`s function is a gentlemen`s agreement and not a column. Moreover, this ideological process was deliberately created to get rid of a certain group of forces that contributed to the birth of this nation. The end will certainly lead to the disintegration of this nation. The “gentleman” agreement proposes four points for the revision of the KPK law. A report by the U.S. House of Representatives detailing its United States Steel Corporation investigation stated that in the 1890s there were two general types of associations or bulk consolidations between steel and ferrous interests in which different groups owned ownership, as well as a high degree of independence: the “pool” and the “Gentleman`s Agreement.”  The latter type lacked a formal organisation to regulate production or prices or forfeiture rules in the event of infringement.  The effectiveness of the agreement relied on members to meet informal commitments.  Until Jackie Robinson was hired by the Brooklyn Dodgers in 1946, a gentlemen`s agreement ensured that African-American players were excluded from organized baseball.
 If we refer to the historical spirit of Pancasila, there are in principle certain things that should be an important record for us to perpetuate the sustainability mandate of this beloved country. First, Pancasila should be called a gentlemen`s agreement. That is, Pancasila does not need to be slaughtered and dimitoscan as something that has a kind of “magic” power. Let Pancasila, as was once an agreement reached by all parts of the nation in the organization of this country. If it is an agreement, all it has to do is have a common obligation to maintain what it has become. Gentlemen`s agreements have come to regulate international activities as the coordination of monetary or trade policies.  According to Edmund Osmasczyk in the United Nations Encyclopedia and International Agreements, it is also defined as “an international term for an oral and unwritten but fully valid agreement.”  This type of agreement may allow a nation to circumvent national legal requirements to enter into a formal contract or it may be useful for a government to want to enter into a secret agreement that does not engage the next government.  According to another author, all international agreements are gentlemen`s agreements because, just before the war, they are all unenforceable.  Osmaczyk noted that there was a difference between gentlemen`s open agreements and secret diplomatic agreements.  In the United States, in 1890, the prohibition of gentlemen`s agreements was introduced in interstate trade relations because the secrecy of these agreements was beyond anyone`s control.  Gentlemen`s agreements have been widely used as discriminatory tactics, allegedly more frequent than restrictive alliances, in order to preserve the homogeneity of upper-class neighborhoods and suburbs in the United States.  The nature of these agreements made it extremely difficult to prove or follow them, and they were long after the U.S.
Supreme Court decisions in Shelley/. Kraemer and Barrows v. Jackson.  A source indicates that the gentlemen`s agreements are “probably still in place” but that their use has declined sharply.  The Islamic group considered that the gentlemen`s agreement, agreed upon by mutual agreement, had only been resolved in a space of dialogue restricted to ppki.